Right to Property

But Ratan’s problem was not over. There was a big problem waiting for him. Madan’s widow demanded half of Ratan’s property. As Madan had no partnership with Ratan, he refused to give any part of it. So, Madan’s widow appealed in the King’s court. The King heard the case and gave his judgement.” Here Baital stopped telling his story. He did not reveal what judgement the King gave. He asked King Vikramaditya, “Was Madan’s widow justified in asking for a share in Ratan’s property?” King Vikramaditya replied, “Yes, she was justified in her demand.” “Why?” Baital asked. King Vikramaditya replied, “It is a fact that she was married to Madan. But one thing is also that she was found by both of them when they were business partners. Therefore, she had the same claim on both of them. On this basis, she was right in her claim for a share in Ratan’s property as well.”

Leave a Comment

Shopping Cart
×

Hello!

Click one of our contacts below to chat on WhatsApp

× How can I help you?